People with PAD have greater risk

メリット

PainVision® PS-2100は、痛みの大きさを電気刺激により数値化します。 客観的数値として表示される独自の「痛み度」と心理的要因を反映する主観的数値であるVisual Analog Scaleとを組み合わせて診断に用いることにより疼痛管理が効果的かつ容易に行うことができます。

ArterioVisionは、測定で得られる指標を組み合わせることにより、確度の高い診断を可能にしています。

術後の疼痛の数値化メリット

術後の痛みを数値化する事により患者と治療医にとって最適な術後管理計画（方針）を促進できます。
術後管理計画（治療方針）を確立する事により医師、病院、患者にとって下記のメリットを享受できます。

医師側

術後の痛みを数値化する事で患部の疼痛管理の不要な処置を軽減し、過剰投与の防止、術後治療からリハビリまでの適切な治療計画を確立できます。

病院側

リハビリまでの術後治療計画の確立により、良質な医療サービスの提供による利益確保が可能にします。

患者側

術後管理の適正化により、質の高い医療サービスと安心、安全な治療、術後処置を受けられるます。

• １．痛みを数値化する事で患者の不快度を医師と共有でき、疾患の特定にもつながる
• ２．痛みが慢性化する事による心因性疼痛（不眠症、うつ病等含）の予防
  
• ３．神経性疼痛の適切な診断、治療が可能

対象

診療科

ペインクリニック、麻酔科

疼痛、治療評価など

脳神経外科、神経内科

疼痛、治療評価など

内分泌内科

糖尿病末梢神経障害の評価

整形外科

疼痛、治療評価など

成外科

疼痛、治療評価など

歯科・口腔外科

疼痛、治療評価など

リウマチ

疼痛評価

老年内科

加齢による神経障害評価

薬理学分野

薬効評価

対象

疼痛管理
臨床研究者
ストレスマネジメントカウンセラー
理学/作業/レクリエーション療法士
精神分析医

研究用オプション

PainVisionは様々な研究用オプションの提供を行っております。

Functional MRIとの併用

口腔内刺激電極

口腔内の電流知覚閾値を計測するために、特別にデザインされたPainVision専用電極と電極用ケーブルの提供が可能です。

臨床研究

PAINVISION® 関連資料のご紹介

疼痛評価

• H. Shimazu, (2001), Quantitative Measurement and Evaluation of Pain The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers No.01-5
• H. Shimazu, (2005), Development of a Quantitative Measurement Method for the Magnitude of Pain Using Painless Electrical Stimulation and Its Evaluation Using Experimental Pain Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering　43(1): 117-123
• S. Seno, (2006), Determination of quantitative measurement method for the magnitude of pain using painless electrical stimulation and its evaluation using experimental pain The Society of Life Support Engineering Vol.18 No2
• H. Arita, (2008), Objective measurement of pain: PainVision Pain Clinic Vol.29 No.1
• H. Arita, (2008), Objective Assessment of Pain Intensity: Device for Quantitative Analysis of Perception and Pain Sensation Anesthesia21 Century No.3-32
• H. Arita, (2009), Objective measurement of pain The Journal of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia Vol.29 No.1, 35～42
• M. Iseki, (2010), Device for Quantitative Analysis of Perception and Pain Sensation The Japanese journal of medical instrumentation Vo l. 80, No. 3
• J. Kato, (2009), Inspection instruments for pain clinic PainVision® Pain Clinic Vol.30 No.1
• M. Yamakage, (2008) Quantitative measurement device for the magnitude of perception and pain　- PAINVISION® PS-2100- Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Vol.32/No.1
• T. Okuda, (2005) A trial of the pain evaluation in the herpes zoster patients – Comparison significance with VAS The Japanese journal of dermatology：115(14), 2373-2380
• J. Hasegawa, (2008) Evaluation of pain treatment by PainVision Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians Vol.15 No.2
• A. Nakao, (2009) Measurement of acute pain with PainVision in a postherpetic neuralgia patient Pain Clinic Vol.30 No.4
• S. Ota, (2009) Application Quantitative measurement device for perception and pain (PainVision) to pharmacological challenges Pain Clinic　Vol.30 No.2
• N. Maekawa, (2009), Can we evaluate pain with PainVision®, a device for quantitative analysis of perception and pain?: A feasibility study of pain in herpes zoster patients The Journal of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia Vol.29 No.7, 824～828
• T. Yamada, (2009), Evaluation of the treatment outcome by an objective assessment with quantitative measurement of the magnitude of pain using electrical stimulation in fibromyalgia patients Clinical Rheumatology and Related Research, 21: 249-255
• A. Noda, (2009), Objective and quantitative assessment of chronic pain in cancer by PainVision The St. Marianna Medical Journal Vol.37, pp. 351-358
• T. Nishikami, (2009), Effect of Hip Traction Therapy on the Non-Operated Side after Unilateral Total Hip / Arthroplasty for Bilateral Osteoarthritis of the Hip The Society of Physical Therapy Science 24(4）613–615
• Y. Udo, (2010), Evaluation of acupuncture treatment for chronic pain patients by PainVision Japanese Acupuncture and Moxibustion 60-2: 190-196
• K. Osada, (2011) Development of the Japanese version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (JFIQ): psychometric assessments of reliability and validity International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2011; 14: 74–80
• H. Matsumura, (2012), Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using ‘the PainVision™ system’ for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects Int Wound J. 2012 Aug;9(4):451-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00911.x. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
• K. Sanada, (2012), Effects of Paroxetine and Milnacipran on Pain Disorder Showa Univ J Med Sci 24（4）, 293～300
• H. Arita, (2014), Determination of the Effectiveness of Light Therapy for Pain The Journal of Japan Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine Vol.34 No.4 M. Fujii, (2014), Assessment of analgesic effect of intravenous lidocaine in the treatment of neuropathic pain using Pain Vision®, a quantitative pain measurement system Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians Vol. 21 (2014) No. 2 p. 124-128
• T. Horie, (2014), The affected skin temperature in the subacute stage predicts postherpetic neuralgia Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians Vol. 21 (2014) No. 1 p. 10-15
• S. Ohtori, (2014), PainVision Apparatus Is Effective for Assessing Low Back Pain Asian Spine J 2014;8(6):793-798
• J. Y. Jung, (2014), Efficacy of Acupuncture in Treating Upper Abdominal Pain in Cancer Patients: Study Protocol for A Randomized Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial Korean Journal of Acupuncture Vol.31, No.1, pp.33-39
• T. Nishimura, (2014), Age-related and sex-related changes in perfusion index in response to noxious electrical stimulation in healthy subjects Journal of Pain Research 2014:7 91–97
• J. Kim, (2014), Correlations Between Electrically Quantified Pain Degree, Subjectively Assessed Visual Analogue Scale, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire: A Pilot Study Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(5):665-672
• H. Yamaoka, (2014), The Base in Four Types of Lidocaine Preparation (Formulated in Hospital) YAKUGAKU ZASSHI Vol. 134 (2014) No. 2 p. 249-258
• H. J. Lee, (2015) Acupuncture in Patients with a Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Clinical Trial Journal of Pharmacopuncture 2015;18(1):079-085
• M. Yutaka, (2015), Application of Pain Quantitative Analysis Device for Assessment of Postoperative Pain after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 2015, 9, 89-93

CPT Measurement

• K. Takahashi, (2008), Current perception thresholds of a body using PainVision –Reproducibility and reliability of the method and physical regional characteristics- The Journal of physical medicine 19(3)
• O. Hasegawa, (2009), Evaluation of diabetic neuropathy by PainVision Peripheral Nerve 20(1)
• O. Hasegawa, (2009), Evaluation of entrapment neuropathies by PainVision Neurological Medicine, 71(6)
• T. Gohda, (2009), Analysis of current perception threshold (CPT) using PainVision PS-2100 in hemodialysis patients Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 42(1) :77 – 83, 2009
• K. nakamura, (2008), Quantitative evaluation of current perception threshold by perception quantitative measuring device (PainVision) for carpal tunnel syndrome Peripheral Nerve 19(2)
• S. Seno, (2011), Evaluation of sex and age differences in the perception threshold of body surface against electrical stimulation: measurement of perception threshold to determine the possibility of diabetic neuropathy diagnoses Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering 49(1) :163-169
• M. Baden, (2011), Evaluation of Diabetic Polyneuropathy by Pain Vision(R) PS-2100, The Device for Quantitative Analysis of Perception and Pain Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society 54(7), 493-498
• S. Seno (2011), Perception Threshold by the Electrical Stimulation on Oral Cavity and Lip Regions Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering 49(6) :925-931
• M. Okamoto, (201), Usefulness of the Pain VisionⓇPS-2100, a Device for the Quantitative Analysis of Perception and Pain Sensation, for Evaluating Early Stage Diabetic Polyneuropathy J. Japan Diab. Soc 56(6): 343~349